June 5, 2026

Ouaga Press

Independent English-language coverage of Burkina Faso's most pressing news and developments.

Burkina Faso’s junta pushes for trials in customs and judicial corruption case

People protest in front of the court house of Ouagadougou on August 13, 2013 where 50 students went on trial. The students were arrested begining of August during a student protest following the closure of their dormitories and university restaurants during the holidays. AFP PHOTO / AHMED OUOBA

Burkina Faso’s junta pushes for trials in customs and judicial corruption case

Allegations of deep-seated corruption are now being highlighted by Korag, an oversight body established last year in Burkina Faso. This institution is tasked with “monitoring the implementation of the nation’s strategic vision” throughout the transitional period. Through an extensive official statement, Korag has revisited a four-year-old case involving customs officials accused of extorting money from truck drivers seeking to transport goods across borders.

According to Korag, investigators had amassed undeniable physical evidence of this illicit racketeering. This included substantial cash sums discovered in the customs agents’ offices and residences, along with witness testimonies and video recordings capturing them in the act.

Despite this compelling evidence, the accused individuals were granted a dismissal of charges, a decision strongly condemned by the junta. The transitional government now alleges that a lawyer and ten senior magistrates from the Ouagadougou Court of Appeal accepted bribes to secure the release of the customs officers and, critically, to disclose the identities of key prosecution witnesses.

Korag vehemently labeled this situation a “judicial masquerade” and a “severe breakdown in the chain of justice and witness protection.” The body considers these grave issues sufficient justification for the arrest of the implicated magistrates last month. The junta has affirmed its commitment to imposing “disciplinary sanctions against unethical members of the judiciary, without ruling out criminal prosecution.”