July 22, 2026

Ouaga Press

Independent English-language coverage of Burkina Faso's most pressing news and developments.

DRC political dialogue faces constitutional hurdles after Bujumbura visit

The leaders of the Coalition Article 64 (C64), a group advocating for constitutional order in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, concluded their visit to Bujumbura on July 9, 2026, following a meeting with President Évariste Ndayishimiye.

In a bid to address concerns about their alignment with President Félix Tshisekedi’s administration, the coalition’s prominent figures took pains to clarify their stance. Martin Fayulu and fellow members denied initiating the meeting, asserting that the Burundian leader—serving as African Union Chair—had extended the invitation. While expressing openness to political dialogue and national unity, the coalition imposed strict conditions.

Core demands for meaningful dialogue

The C64’s leadership underscored that any genuine negotiation must begin with the withdrawal of the constitutional amendment proposal, the release of political detainees, the cessation of politically motivated prosecutions, and the restoration of public freedoms. These prerequisites, they argued, are non-negotiable pillars for credible engagement.

Rejecting constitutional violations

The coalition’s position centers on upholding the Constitution, the rule of law, and the Congolese people’s sovereignty. They highlighted that past peace efforts failed because they overlooked the political roots of the crisis, leaving fundamental grievances unaddressed.

A call for institutional integrity

The proposed constitutional changes under President Tshisekedi’s leadership—amid ongoing conflict and territorial occupation—are viewed as a critical obstacle to stability. The C64 reiterated its opposition to these revisions, demanding adherence to institutional norms instead. On July 22, the coalition plans to stage a peaceful march to the Palais de la Nation, demanding President Tshisekedi’s resignation for allegedly violating his constitutional oath.